Digg admits they manually Bury Stories
June 26, 2008
We were leaked a response from Digg regarding an editor that had his story go popular .. for 6 seconds.
Excerpt from the Editor’s e-mail to Digg:
My popular count in my profile increased by 1.
I do not believe the story was buried.
Digg’s Response:
Thanks for taking the time to contact us at Digg.com.
The Digg.com Team did in fact bury the story do to website redundancy.
We want to stress that the article in question was not ‘redundant’ the source was. Meaning that the same news outlet just happened to publish two breaking news stories…
We have heard of Digg manually burying stories.. such as the HD-DVD fiasco… but this… because the same news outlet published two breaking news stories… IE: the reporters at the outlet did their job and broke two news stories got buried…
Digg in the past has banned sites such as SqlSpace.Com for publishing a screen shot of Ubuntu being on Windows Market Place. That was censorship.. this is flatly stating that Digg users are too ‘stupid’ to make their own decisions on what is a good story.. and what isn’t.
If Digg had any morals, they would let this go popular since Digg is a community driven site that should respect the wishes of their community.
If the Digg users feel the story is worthless, then please allow them to bury it.. not some individual at Digg that feels that their users are not intelligent enough to make their own decisions on what story is good.. and what isn’t.
It’s an insult to all of us.
If this isn’t stopped now - It’s the end of Digg
June 14, 2008
This will be the end of Digg if this is allowed to happen. This is a snippet from the article posted on the Drudge Retort. The initial source article was buried on Digg… and perhaps because it really didn’t explain the ramifications of this issue…
The fact is if this happens.. Digg is toast.. burying that article was akin to trying to stuff an elephant under a rug.. if this is not exposed… the site you found this story on won’t exist in its current format.
IN short, what happened was simple, The Drudge Retort takes a sentence as a headline, then a few sentences describing the news story.. and then a link to the AP source.. (or whatever source it is… a blog, another news company, wired magazine, engadget, gizmodo … you get the idea). However the AP called that copyright infringement and offered a take down notice to Drudge Retort… This is nearly identical to the format used on Digg for a large amount of the stories.. meaning that if this succeeds.. Digg is under direct threat… as well as other popular forums such as SqlSpace, slashdot and even simple sites like the Drudge Report are under threat..
If this succeeds you are not even really allowed to copy a headline for a link… virtually the basis of how the majority of people submit articles to Digg and others. This needs to stop now… or else you are going to see the entire basis of how many of us obtain news from social sites, forums or blogs will be under direct threat.
AP Files 7 DMCA Takedowns Against Drudge Retort
I’m currently engaged in a legal disagreement with the Associated Press, which claims that Drudge Retort users linking to its stories are violating its copyright and committing “‘hot news’ misappropriation under New York state law.” An AP attorney filed six Digital Millenium Copyright Act takedown requests this week demanding the removal of blog entries and another for a user comment.
The Retort is a community site comparable in function to Digg, Reddit and Mixx. The 8,500 users of the site contribute blog entries of their own authorship and links to interesting news articles on the web, which appear immediately on the site. None of the six entries challenged by AP, which include two that I posted myself, contains the full text of an AP story or anything close to it. They reproduce short excerpts of the articles — ranging in length from 33 to 79 words — and five of the six have a user-created headline.
Digg has been down for hours
June 12, 2008
Digg’s network is still unreachable as of 9:30 EST on Thursday June 12, 2008. It has been down for several hours. It’s not just that HTTP is down, you can’t even ping the servers. I bet Microsoft is upset as their advertising provider…
Pinging digg.com [64.191.203.30] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 64.191.203.30:
Packets: Sent = 2, Received = 0, Lost = 2 (100% loss),
Why do we care? Because our story was upcoming heading right to the main page when the site went down… oh well.. life goes on…
Digg : We are not being bought my Microsoft or Google
March 7, 2008
TechCrunch pushed out an article stating that Digg is for sale and the next thing you know, within hours Digg responds with we are not for sale
Hey all,
Normally our policy is to not comment about things like this, but this morning’s rumors about a bidding war involving Google and Microsoft have created such a stir we feel compelled to tell you all directly that they are completely inaccurate.
Sorry to burst any drama theories, but they aren’t true. We remain focused on improving Digg and rolling out great features.
-Jay
The problem here is that the article was credible enough to warrant a response from Digg. Why? Because Microsoft is in a 3 year agreement with Digg for advertising and has been known to ban any site that states anything that paints Microsoft in a bad light.
Interesting story to stay the least, the dollar figures quote where between a quarter to a half billion dollars as the purchase price.
Microsoft wanted to buy Digg in 2007 - and is considering it again
February 18, 2008
This story is developing….. and is subjected to being edited as the story unfolds.
After a lead came into Tribble Advertising Agency we went on some investigative research and discovered that Microsoft actually considered buying Digg in 2007. Since the failed attempt with Microsoft buying Yahoo! , Digg is back on the table and Microsoft is considering to purchase Digg again.
What is unknown is if Digg actually received a formal offer and this was only a Microsoft internal debate. Calls to Digg went unanswered, Calls to Microsoft were met with a ‘no comment’. (No Comment by the way states much since it wasn’t a denial).
Microsoft has nearly full access to Digg’s traffic levels as being the advertising outlet for Digg, Hence Microsoft isn’t working on partial information, Microsoft is working on nearly full information in terms of traffic and conversion rates for ads. However our source stated ‘ad revenue isn’t the reason’ for the consideration of the purchase of Digg, it’s the outlet to technology savvy individuals. The hopes are to leverage that existing user base to help paint Microsoft as a technology company again rather than monopolistic monster that destroyed innvoation in the market place.
Microsoft already has editorial review with Digg, as well with carrying weight with many business decisions. It has inflamed and enraged many visitors of Digg as of current.
A Microsoft purchases would upset many as it’s virtually a hotbed of Linux and Apple users. Generally in the technology industry, Microsoft is the one to hate, not the one to love.
Story Developing….
New Digg Bug — don’t like TechCruch :)
February 14, 2008
Looks like Digg has a new bug, no comments… The below screenshot has an interesting tidbit. It appears that no one can comment on the TechCrunch post. Interesting , like someone there hit the ‘no comment’ checkbox.
Digg - It’s time to unban SqlSpace.Com
December 31, 2007
Dear Digg,
We understand the need to enforce the TOS, we understand the reasons for not wanting to upset Microsoft as they are your ad provider. We totally understand you are trying to build a business.
That being stated, it’s time to unban SqlSpace.Com
It’s been well over 1/2 a year since the forum hosted a screenshot of Ubuntu being a featured product on Windows Marketplace.
For some background, The forum, Sqlspace.com hosted a screenshot of Ubuntu being a featured product on Microsoft’s windows marketplace, because of this Digg banned the site.
It’s been well over half a year since the event.
It’s time to allow the forum to be back on Digg.
Recognized by Advertising Age Magazine as top Power 150 news outlet for Advertising and Marketing.
Recognized and listed in Google News. Don't stress, we're Satire
Ad Agency Advertising
