Saatchi saving the world? or Polluting the world?
Hey George,
We think it’s only fair that Ad Scam links back to Tribble :) We like your stuff, we link to it in our blog roll… show some love back George! :)
Regards to Agency Spy’s post regarding Saatchi trying to save the world. Her post is great… but it’s of our opinion on a serious note that traditional Advertising Agencies are one of the leading causes of deforestation and overall print pollution, that contributes to Global Warming. If these Agencies, such as Saatchi were not buying quarter million dollar full page ads in magazines, then they wouldn’t be chopping down trees like mad and using tons of ink, gas to distribute the papers and untold mountains of waste after the ad / magazine is tossed.
For Saatchi to save the world, they would be forced to only do InterActive Marketing and TV and stop all their print media purchases… good luck with that.. they might as well close shop.
Saatchi couldn’t save its own arse… Bunch of wankers. The “Red Wig” campaign was shit. Anyway, they’re set to lose the biz completely. So much for bloody “Lovemarks!” And yes… I’ve linked to you on AdScam. So now you can shut the fuck up… Just kidding, I love you guys… Yeah, right.
Cheers/George