The Advertising Agency Oligopoly
June 4, 2008
George Parker published this article regarding the fact that Interpublic Group (IPG) has launched a new agency in India christened Pickle.
It’s not that they ‘launched a new agency’ it’s why they did it… and why it’s such a problem in our industry.
“Pickle,” which will function as a full service agency and handle business that conflicts with IPG’s older agency Lowe India. IPG’s other agency in India SSC&B Lintas will be merged with the new outfit. Pickle will now service the former’s existing accounts, besides pitching for new business.
One of his commentators actually put it in the best possible way.
Creating splinter agencies and merging the old to eliminate conflicts of interest is just smoke and mirrors. But as the agency world is basically owned by a handful of companies now, what else can you expect?
That is the root of the problem… so it’s our guess that IPG felt that they can simplistically open another office, call it pickles… and bingo.. all the conflicts are gone… they didn’t even have to bother with that.. they could of just changed phone numbers… That’s what Pepsi fell for when Omnicom had a field day with them.
The sad state of affairs that the Advertising industry is facing is this simple fact, we live in an oligopoly. A half-dozen companies control our entire advertising industry, something to an estimate of 87% of total agency billable hours go though 6 holding companies.
The fact that InterPublic will open up a fake agency, call it pickles and literally just compete with it’s sister firm to give the appearance of being a differing agency is an outrage…
I don’t know what is worse, the fact that Interpublic is doing this.. or that they have idiot clients that will fall for it.
Amazing stuff.
Comments
-
http://themarketer.typepad.com/ Gordon Whitehead
-
http://themarketer.typepad.com Gordon Whitehead
-
http://www.tribbleagency.com/ TheFounder
-
http://www.tribbleagency.com TheFounder


