Media Cheat Sheet For Ron Paul
December 30, 2011
National Main Stream Media Checklist, Must follow below guidelines:
1 - Do not mention the word Ron Paul, or if you must bury the mention on page 2 or lower of the article as long as he is polling below a critical threshold.
2 - If Ron Paul does exceed the threshold, do not write any articles about him unless they contain the words “racist newsletters” above the fold in the articles. Do not mention the fact that the decades old articles were not written by him anywhere on page 1 of the article.
3 - If Ron Paul does win Iowa, dismiss the entire state as non relevant farmers that do not represent the general United States. Use anything other than the words “win” : 5 approved headlines to use in case of a Ron Paul win in Iowa.
3-1 - Romney beats Gingrich for second place in Iowa
3-2 - Gingrich beats Romney for second place in Iowa
3-3 - Surprise Rise of Santorum in Iowa
3-4 - Bachmann endorses Romney after Iowa Vote
3-5 - Bachmann endorses Gingrich after Iowa Vote
4 - In case of Ron Paul win in Iowa and New Hampshire approved headlines are as follows:
4-1 - Ron Paul threatens allies such as Israel.
4-2 - Ron Paul threatens to cut Medicare for seniors
4-3 - Ron Paul economic policy will lead us to a second great depression
4-4 - Ron Paul to disband larges parts of US military
4-5 - Ron Paul’s foreign policy will lead to another 9/11
A mixture of half-truth’s and incomplete information can help cloud the water.
Example Headine :
Ron Paul soundly wins Iowa
vs
Romney beats Gingrich in Iowa
The first leads to greater support for non desirable Ron Paul, the second confuses the reader and implies that Romney won the election, when in fact he came in second place.
Other approved talking points:
1 - Ron Paul cannot win elections
2 - Ron Paul is out of “mainstream”
Counter Arguments:
Ron Paul can claim that the current system isn’t working and he’s the only one that can fix the economic and political mess that we are in.
This might resonate with some parts of the voter population, Ron Paul has a very strong floor support so the goal is to force Ron Paul NOT to run 3ed party as it would most likely force a 3 party system in the United States, something we are not prepared to deal with at this time.
A mass defection of financial conservatives and anti-war liberals to a Ron Paul 3ed party run would most likely form a strong libertarian party with 20% of elected officials running under that label within a decade.
This would make a full mockery of the system that we have established over the past decades and a party such as the libertarians would make it difficult to get passage of key funding and subsidies for industry.
In short, we have to ensure that Ron Paul does NOT get the GOP nomination, but we really have to ensure that he doesn’t go 3ed party.
Related Posts:
Recognized by Advertising Age Magazine as top Power 150 news outlet for Advertising and Marketing.
Recognized and listed in Google News. Don't stress, we're Satire
Ad Agency Advertising
